☕️🌺 Episode VII Grand Finale: I thoroughly enjoyed every second of it. Unfortunately, our fanbase is divided, with mixed emotions.
The world of film and television, especially something as beloved and entrenched in pop culture as Star Wars, is a complex web of emotions, expectations, and personal connections. When we sit down to watch, we’re not just consuming a product—we’re engaging with something that speaks to us personally, often tapping into years of memories, nostalgia, and passion. So, when that experience doesn’t meet our expectations, the knee-jerk reaction can be frustration, disappointment, or even outright disdain.
But here’s where it gets interesting: Should a show or film be viewed with an open mind, or should it strictly adhere to a list of objective “rules” to be considered good? The truth is the beauty of media lies in its subjectivity. Every viewer brings their own life experiences, preferences, and emotions to the table, and that's what makes each opinion unique. Just because a show doesn’t meet the letter of what we think it should be doesn’t mean it’s a failure—it just means it didn’t resonate with us in the way we hoped.
This is where subjective reviews shine. They aren’t about checking boxes or analyzing the technicalities to the nth degree. They’re about capturing the feeling the episode or film evokes. They speak to how an episode makes us feel in the moment—whether it sparks joy, excitement, nostalgia, or even frustration. That personal connection is the heartbeat of why we love stories in the first place. And, ultimately, that's what drives us to continue watching: the potential to connect with a story on a personal level.
However, objective analysis also plays an important role in evaluating media. It gives us a framework to discuss the craft of storytelling: the structure, pacing, character development, and world-building. It’s about asking, “Does this episode do what it set out to do? Is it consistent with its universe? Is the writing strong? Are the characters evolving?” Objective analysis gives us a way to evaluate the technical side of a show or film, providing a clearer sense of whether the creators succeeded in their artistic vision.
But here’s the kicker: these two perspectives aren’t mutually exclusive. In fact, they should work together in harmony to create a fuller picture. A great review is one that balances the emotional resonance with a critical eye. It’s recognizing that, while you might not love every aspect of a show, there’s likely something to appreciate in the craft, the performances, or the world-building. On the flip side, if you find something truly compelling—something that speaks to you emotionally—you can still acknowledge where the show might have faltered technically, without dismissing the entire experience.
This balance between subjective and objective isn’t just for film critics. It’s a model we all can follow when evaluating media. It’s about being honest with us: Why do we like something? Is it the characters? The themes? The action? Or is it the sheer joy of escaping into another world? And, just as importantly, is the show doing what it set out to do?
In the end, that’s the beauty of being a viewer in today’s world—our perspective matters. A review isn’t just about pointing out flaws or praising perfection. It’s about understanding the intricate dance between personal preference and technical achievement. It’s about capturing the emotional ride, while also appreciating the craftsmanship behind the scenes. So, let go of the rigid expectations and allow yourself to experience the show. Whether you love it or hate it, your feelings are valid. And a compelling review will always honor that balance—your personal journey, and the work of those who created the story.
That’s what makes a review not just compelling, but real. And that’s why it matters.
Comments